※Mimesis
Mimesis (/maɪˈmiːsəs/; Ancient Greek: μίμησις (mīmēsis),
from μιμεῖσθαι (mīmeisthai), "to imitate," from μῖμος (mimos),
"imitator, actor") is a critical and
philosophical term that carries a wide range of meanings, which include imitation, representation, mimicry, imitatio,
receptivity, nonsensuous similarity, the act of resembling, the act of
expression, and the presentation of the self.
In ancient Greece,
mimesis was an idea that governed the creation of works of art, in particular,
with correspondence to the physical world understood as a model for
beauty, truth, and the good. Plato contrasted mimesis, or imitation, with diegesis, or narrative. After Plato, the
meaning of mimesis eventually shifted toward a specifically literary function
in ancient Greek society, and its use has changed and been reinterpreted many
times since.
One of the best-known modern studies of mimesis, understood
as a form of realism in
literature, is Erich Auerbach's Mimesis: The
Representation of Reality in Western Literature, which opens with a famous comparison between the way the
world is represented in Homer's Odyssey and
the way it appears in the Bible. From these two seminal Western
texts, Auerbach builds the foundation for a unified theory of representation
that spans the entire history of Western literature, including the Modernist
novels being written at the time Auerbach began his study. In art history,
"mimesis", "realism" and "naturalism" are used,
often interchangeably, as terms for the accurate, even
"illusionistic", representation of the visual appearance of
things.
The Frankfurt school critical
theorist T. W. Adorno made
use of mimesis as a central philosophical term, interpreting it as a way in
which works of art embodied a form of reason that was non-repressive
and non-violent.
During the nineteenth century, the racial politics of
imitation towards African Americans influenced the term mimesis and its
evolution.
Mimesis has been theorised by thinkers as diverse as Plato, Aristotle, Philip Sidney, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Adam Smith, Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, Paul Ross, Theodor Adorno, Erich Auerbach, Luce Irigaray, Jacques Derrida, René Girard, Nikolas Kompridis, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Michael Taussig, Merlin Donald, and Homi Bhabha.
※Catharsis
Catharsis (from
Greek κάθαρσις katharsis meaning
"purification" or "cleansing") is the purification and purgation
of emotions—especially pity and fear—through art[1] or any
extreme change in emotion that results in renewal and restoration. It is a
metaphor originally used by Aristotle in the Poetics, comparing the
effects of tragedy on the mind of a spectator to the effect of a cathartic on the body.
※Dramatic uses
Catharsis is a term in dramatic
art that describes the effect of tragedy (or comedy and quite
possibly other artistic forms) principally on the audience (although
some have speculated on characters in the drama as well). Nowhere does Aristotle explain
the meaning of "catharsis" as he is using
that term in the definition of tragedy in the Poetics (1449b21-28). G. F. Else argues that traditional,
widely held interpretations of catharsis as "purification" or
"purgation" have no basis in the text of the Poetics, but are derived from the use of catharsis in other
Aristotelian and non-Aristotelian contexts.For this reason, a number of diverse
interpretations of the meaning of this term have arisen. The term is often
discussed along with Aristotle's concept of anagnorisis.
D. W. Lucas, in an authoritative edition of the Poetics,
comprehensively covers the various nuances inherent in the meaning of the term
in an Appendix devoted to "Pity, Fear, and
Katharsis". Lucas recognizes the possibility of catharsis
bearing some aspect of the meaning of "purification, purgation, and
'intellectual clarification'" although his discussion of these terms is
not always, or perhaps often, in the precise form with which other influential
scholars have treated them. Lucas himself does not accept any one of these
interpretations as his own but adopts a rather different one based on "the Greek doctrine of Humours" which has not
received wide subsequent acceptance. Purgation and purification, used in
previous centuries, as the common interpretations of catharsis are still in
wide use today. More recently, in the twentieth century, the
interpretation of catharsis as "intellectual clarification" has
arisen as a rival to the older views in describing the effect of catharsis on
members of the audience.
※Ode on a Grecian Urn
"Ode on a Grecian Urn" is a poem written by
the English Romantic poet John Keats in
May 1819 and published anonymously in the January 1820, Number 15, issue of the
magazine Annals of the Fine Arts (see 1820 in poetry).
The poem is one of several "Great Odes of 1819", which includes "Ode on Indolence", "Ode
on Melancholy", "Ode
to a Nightingale", and "Ode to Psyche". Keats found earlier forms of poetry unsatisfactory for his
purpose, and the collection represented a new development of the ode form. He was inspired
to write the poem after reading two articles by English artist and writer Benjamin Haydon.
Keats was aware of other works on classical Greek art, and had first-hand exposure
to the Elgin Marbles,
all of which reinforced his belief that classical Greek art was idealistic and
captured Greek virtues, which forms the basis of the poem.
※Roman Fever
Plot
In the story, Grace Ansley and Alida Slade were middle-aged American women
visiting Rome with their daughters, Barbara Ansley and Jenny Slade.
The elder women grew up in Manhattan, New York,
and were friends from childhood. A youthful and romantic rivalry led Mrs. Slade
to nurture feelings of jealousy and hatred against Mrs. Ansley.
In the opening pages of the story, the two women compare
their daughters and reflect on each other's lives. Eventually, Mrs. Slade
reveals a secret about a letter written to Mrs. Ansley on a visit to Rome many
years ago. The letter was purportedly from Mrs. Slade's fiancé, Delphin,
inviting Mrs. Ansley to a rendezvous at the Colosseum. In fact, Mrs.
Slade herself had written the letter, in an attempt to get Mrs. Ansley out of
the way of the engagement by disappointing her with Delphin's absence (and, it
is implied, to get Mrs. Ansley sick with Roman Fever). Mrs. Ansley is upset at this revelation, but reveals that
she was not left alone at the Colosseum—she responded to the letter, and
Delphin arrived to meet her. Mrs. Slade eventually states that Mrs. Ansley
ought not to feel sorry for her, because "I had [Delphin] for twenty-five
years" while Mrs. Ansley had "nothing but a letter he didn't write."
Mrs. Ansley responds, in the last sentence of the story, "I had
Barbara."
Analysis
A deeper reading of Edith Wharton’s “Roman Fever” displays a
major emphasis on the multiple figurative dimensions of knitting. Wharton
establishes this chief theme early on by making sure that the matter of
knitting is the first subject to receive any attention: “let’s leave the young
things to their knitting.” The first impression of the knitting women is that
they are incapable of anything more than the monotonous act of knitting; this
sets the stage for the stereotypical mundane middle-aged woman image to be
blasted apart.
Video
※Irony
Irony (from Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία (eirōneía), meaning 'dissimulation, feigned ignorance'), in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event in which what
appears, on the surface, to be the case, differs radically from what is
actually the case. Irony may be divided into categories such as verbal, dramatic,
and situational.
Verbal, dramatic, and situational irony are often used for
emphasis in the assertion of a truth. The ironic form of simile, used in sarcasm, and some forms
of litotes can
emphasize one's meaning by the deliberate use of language which states the
opposite of the truth, denies the contrary of the truth, or drastically and
obviously understates a factual connection.
Other forms, as identified by historian Connop Thirlwall, include dialectic and
practical irony.
Verbal Irony
Verbal irony is a statement in which the meaning that a speaker
employs is sharply different from the meaning that is ostensibly expressed. An ironic statement usually involves the explicit expression
of one attitude or evaluation, but with indications in the overall
speech-situation that the speaker intends a very different, and often opposite,
attitude or evaluation.
Dramatic Irony
This type of irony exploits the device of giving the
spectator an item of information that at least one of the characters in the
narrative is unaware of (at least consciously), thus placing the spectator a
step ahead of at least one of the characters. Connop Thirlwall in his 1833
article On the Irony of Sophocles originally
highlighted the role of irony in drama.
Situational Irony
This is a relatively modern use of the term, and describes a
sharp discrepancy between the expected result and actual results in a certain
situation.
※Roman Numeral
※Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and
"stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or
expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.
Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and
even expulsion.
Recently, cases of 'extreme plagiarism' have been identified in academia.The
modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as
an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with
the Romantic movement.
Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can
constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a
serious ethical offense. Plagiarism and copyright infringement
overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and
many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is
defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts. Plagiarism is not
defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions (including professional
associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as
publishing companies).
※Affixes
hypo-:word-forming element
meaning "under, beneath; less, less than" (in chemistry, indicating a
lesser oxidation), from Greek hypo (prep. and adverb)
"under, beneath; up from under; toward and under (i.e. into)," from
PIE root *upo "under."
hypothalamus hypogean hypostasis
para-:before vowels, par-,
word-forming element meaning "alongside, beyond; altered; contrary;
irregular, abnormal," from Greek para- from para (prep.)
"beside, near, issuing from, against, contrary to," from PIE *prea,
from root *per- (1)
"forward," hence "toward, near, against." Cognate with Old
English for- "off,
away."
sub-:word-forming element
meaning "under, beneath; behind; from under; resulting from further
division," from Latin preposition sub "under, below,
beneath, at the foot of," also "close to, up to, towards;" of
time, "within, during;" figuratively "subject to, in the power
of;" also "a little, somewhat" (as in sub-horridus "somewhat
rough"), from PIE *(s)up- (perhaps representing *ex-upo-),
a variant form of the root *upo "under,"
also "up from under." The Latin word also was used as a prefix and in
various combinations.
In Latin assimilated to following -c-, -f-, -g-, -p-, and often -r- and -m-. In Old French the prefix appears in the full Latin form only "in learned adoptions of old Latin compounds" [OED], and in popular use it was represented by sous-, sou-; as in French souvenir from Latin subvenire, souscrire (Old French souzescrire) from subscribere, etc.
The original meaning is now obscured in many words from Latin (suggest, suspect, subject, etc.). The prefix is active in Modern English, sometimes meaning "subordinate" (as in subcontractor); "inferior" (17c., as in subhuman); "smaller" (18c.); "a part or division of" (c. 1800, as in subcontinent).
In Latin assimilated to following -c-, -f-, -g-, -p-, and often -r- and -m-. In Old French the prefix appears in the full Latin form only "in learned adoptions of old Latin compounds" [OED], and in popular use it was represented by sous-, sou-; as in French souvenir from Latin subvenire, souscrire (Old French souzescrire) from subscribere, etc.
The original meaning is now obscured in many words from Latin (suggest, suspect, subject, etc.). The prefix is active in Modern English, sometimes meaning "subordinate" (as in subcontractor); "inferior" (17c., as in subhuman); "smaller" (18c.); "a part or division of" (c. 1800, as in subcontinent).
-graph:modern word-forming
element meaning "instrument for recording; that which writes, marks, or
describes; something written," from Greek -graphos "-writing,
-writer" (as in autographos "written with one's own
hand"), from graphe "writing, the art of writing, a
writing," from graphein "to write, express by
written characters," earlier "to draw, represent by lines drawn"
(see -graphy).
Adopted widely (Dutch -graaf, German -graph, French -graphe,
Spanish -grafo). Related: -grapher; -graphic; -graphical.







沒有留言:
張貼留言